Did it trump the jueza with the mistake?

a) Facts, TO (SEE)
Last Wednesday, the 13th of January, the jueza of the court nº 1 of Illescas, imposes the mayor of Seseña Manuel Source, a deposit of A MILLION €, for a supposed calumnies crime to the "Well-digger", who as he announced in 2006, it was going to fry it to complaints.
An impressive fuss takes place mediático included a servant gives some press conference as that with the regional IU coordinator in Albacete and 20 hours later, the proper jueza dictates a “rectification car” in the one that "reduces" the exhorbitant deposit to 10.000€ (TEN THOUSAND, this way in letters, as in the heels, that then some zero escapes), under the supposed reason of a “computer error” having been committed.
b) You ask, TO (JUDGE)
•: Does proportionality exist between the imposed deposit and the supposed crime of calumnies?
•: Is this deposit imposed out of fear that it escapes, because this way the well-digger is salted by his or for being a town councilor of IU?
•: Someone will understand that it is compared by those who have had to pay to go out of the jail: Rock, (Malaya), Preñafeta (Pretoria), or Galley slave (Gürtel)?
•: How can go out cheaper to be kept silent, to look for another side, or to accept the bribes, which to denounce the injustice and the corruption?
•: How did TWO ZEROS escape and also in two different paragraphs?. Parquinson of the notary?
•: Has the rectification been for an error or for the popular pressure arisen before tamaña atrocity? And if it was an error: did nobody warn it and they were taken 20 hours in correcting it?
•: Did it trump the jueza when in 2006 – and as he was publishing the World - it saved the well-digger more than 300 million euros to allow him to buy for 2,5 million euros, a few grounds that were costing 316 and with which he was thinking to gain another 1.200 millions more constructing the Quiñón de Seseña?
•: Did it trump the jueza in the mistake on having considered these grounds to be "rustic" that, re-qualified 14 days later how “urban“, for an imputed mayor of the Spanish socialist party and with to the support of the PP and of the meeting of CLM, already did they multiply for 126?
c) Proposals, TO (ACT).
Izquierda Unida, which takes a lot of time denouncing the corruption, both town-planning and political, presented in the Congress of the deputies “Struggle plan against the corruption”, composed by 48 measurements. Let's hope that although it should be only for shame torera it should be supported by PP and Spanish socialist party, which they compete in the one who leads the ranking of imputed charges, as well as for the rest of the parties.
Also we hope, that the citizenship should support “it goes on foot against the corruption”, that going out from Seseña next January 30, will come to Madrid, culminating in a concentration opposite to the congress of the deputies on 11 a.m. of Sunday, the 31st. A mobilization opened to groups and citizenship in general, to show a warm support to Manuel Fuentes, this leader of the honesty, of the value and of the struggle against the corruption in Spain, who like David against Giant, will win with the wave (that not ONDE that is the company of the well-digger) of the solidarity.
Since it is done usually in these cases, which the complaint files and the game is not done to those who trying to give a notice to navigators, obstruct the justice, so that nobody tries to stop the powerful ones.
========